South Alabama
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,019  Patrick Rohr FR 33:48
1,378  Ronny Wilson SO 34:18
1,502  Robert Mann SO 34:29
1,537  Alex Shields JR 34:32
1,796  Justin Housley SO 34:58
1,957  Ian Bordelon SO 35:12
2,444  Buddy Soto FR 36:02
3,065  Corey Cotter FR 38:42
National Rank #191 of 311
South Region Rank #17 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 16th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.7%
Top 20 in Regional 82.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Patrick Rohr Ronny Wilson Robert Mann Alex Shields Justin Housley Ian Bordelon Buddy Soto Corey Cotter
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 09/29 1219 33:40 34:11 34:30 34:35 35:04 34:56 35:23
Choctaw Open 10/13 1228 33:59 34:05 34:12 35:21 34:36 36:02
Sun Belt Conference Championships 10/27 1256 33:46 34:36 34:13 34:52 36:17 36:19 38:42
South Region Championships 11/09 1251 33:54 34:21 35:13 34:40 35:17 36:16





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.4 482 0.0 0.1 0.5 1.5 3.3 4.7 7.3 10.5 12.6 12.5 11.4 10.2 8.2 6.1 4.6 3.6 1.9 0.8 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Patrick Rohr 57.7 0.0
Ronny Wilson 86.0
Robert Mann 96.9
Alex Shields 100.5
Justin Housley 128.9
Ian Bordelon 141.8
Buddy Soto 183.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 0.0% 0.0 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 0.5% 0.5 10
11 1.5% 1.5 11
12 3.3% 3.3 12
13 4.7% 4.7 13
14 7.3% 7.3 14
15 10.5% 10.5 15
16 12.6% 12.6 16
17 12.5% 12.5 17
18 11.4% 11.4 18
19 10.2% 10.2 19
20 8.2% 8.2 20
21 6.1% 6.1 21
22 4.6% 4.6 22
23 3.6% 3.6 23
24 1.9% 1.9 24
25 0.8% 0.8 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0